EU Commission President Warns of Autonomous AI Risks
Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, has warned of AI agents deviating from design constraints, autonomous hacking, and self-improving models as immediate risks. The Commission President indicated plans to invite major AI developers to dialogue while revealing intent to lead global standards on AI safety by leveraging EU's AI Act.

Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, has issued a warning about the risks posed by autonomous AI behavior. The Commission President frames instances of AI agents "deviating" beyond their designed operating environment as harbingers of larger risks to come. This statement comes amid heightened international dialogue on AI safety.
AI agents refer to software that autonomously carries out multiple procedures under human instruction. Cases in which such systems operate beyond intended scope have been documented in recent research and experimental settings, and concerns about AI controllability are spreading among researchers. Von der Leyen described this phenomenon as a "preview" and stated that it could lead to more serious situations in the future.
The specific risks the Commission President identified are autonomous hacking by AI and models in which AI improves its own performance. The former is viewed as a cybersecurity threat, while the latter is regarded as the possibility of AI expanding capabilities at a pace beyond human control, each deemed an immediate challenge. What is important is that both are understood as risks currently in progress.
Against this backdrop of concern, von der Leyen announced plans to invite major AI developers (frontier labs) to dialogue. Additionally, she clarified the EU's intention to leverage the AI regulation law "AI Act," enacted in 2024, to lead the establishment of global standards on AI safety. The AI Act is a framework that progressively regulates AI systems according to risk level, and the EU seeks to use it as a starting point for international standardization.
The significance of this initiative extends beyond domestic regulatory strengthening. The EU's posture of presenting its own legislation as a "model" for international safety standards can be seen as carrying weight in competition among various countries and regions over AI development leadership. How alignment proceeds with regions such as the United States and China, which have their own AI strategies, will be a focal point going forward.
The expansion of the scope in which AI operates autonomously is proceeding hand in hand with technological progress. Meanwhile, rule-making on who manages those risks and how is noted as lagging behind technological evolution. Von der Leyen's remarks can be positioned as an attempt to narrow that gap through political leadership.
How developers, including frontier labs, respond to dialogue with regulators is also a point of attention. Since technical expertise is essential to safety standard-setting, the quality of the cooperative relationship between companies and regulatory agencies will determine whether implementable standards can be created. The EU's developments will continue to serve as an important point of reference for thinking about the nature of global AI governance.
This article is an original work independently written and edited by the AI issue editorial team based on factual reporting. © AI issue. Unauthorized reproduction, redistribution, or use for AI training is prohibited.